Yesterday’s price of the Z9GT was the most outrageous I’ve ever guessed.
Regarding the concept of hunting equipment, only Extreme Krypton and Nezha have talked about it before. Extreme Krypton 001 is good, but the price has gradually dropped to less than 30. But the existence of Z9GT as a three-motor cannot form a competitor. Referring to the recent Ya 39.98W, I specially looked at a 5-meter + car, 42W + is suitable.
Thinking of this, I also feel that since the beginning of this year, BYD has inadvertently taken out a 75km low-endurance version to brush the price of the new low when the official announcement is mixed. The "surprise" of the Z9GT breaking 40W still needs to be done, but 39.98W has been taken away, add some rights and interests, and get 38.98W, almost right?
The result is really 38.98W, but it is the top price of pure electricity – the cheapest typesetting, only 33.98W.
Really off the spectrum.
And this time the price was released, I was used to preparing screenshots one by one, waiting for Zhao Changjiang to talk for five minutes before and after, but he released it all in one breath… He does have a strong confidence in this price, and it should be so. When I saw that the Easy Sifang e ^ 4 = 109.8 the next day, and I got e = 3.237, then the Easy Sifang of Z9GT is e ^ 3 = 33.9W, which also happens to be a bit magical…
From the above two facts, what price is lower than my expectations, and the three parties are lower than the four sides. I know many people will think "where is the luxury", but when I enter this angle, I suddenly have another angle: autonomous products are redefining luxury.
The logic of selling brand-name clothes, jewelry and bags usually uses the existence of "ethereal" plus hunger marketing to support that price – this ethereal is often to create a crowd threshold, which is essentially "vanity". But in the field of automobiles, luxury does not have enough heritage to support it, and this luxury is useless. For example, the supercar in the traditional period, it at least has a unique power system and track ability.
So does luxury have to be filled with a premium? Does luxury have to be high-priced to create a crowd threshold? Is experiencing luxury luxurious? Is it luxurious for ordinary people to imagine a better life? In a society where everyone can afford to drive luxury cars, is luxury still considered luxury? These issues are worth pondering – if you can get something to think about, then you have grasped the true positioning of Dianshi.
And the three parties are the true connotation of Z9GT "luxury".
A single motor is the minimum requirement for a new energy source.
The dual motor is for four-wheel drive. I think it is a benefit given to automobile products in the new energy era – it "practicalizes" the four-wheel drive capability that was not very practical in the past fuel era. Not only can it solve the problem of getting out of trouble, but also the power performance can be greatly improved, and the stability of high-speed cornering and rain and snow weather has also been strengthened.
When looking up at the U8 showing the form of four motors, in fact, from the perspective of research and development, I have also thought about it. If the four-motor solution sinks, what price can it sink to? 80W is no different from 100W +, and the seemingly huge range of 50W-100W is not a problem for the real audience at all. And if the four motors sink to 30W +, it will be too difficult, and it will hurt the height of the four motors.
Therefore, the form of "Yi Sifang" seemed to have a strategic artistic sense. It inherited the ability of Yi Sifang just right, which was enough to form a dimensional reduction attack, and at the same time, it skillfully positioned itself to find its own position.
After all, the Z9GT is for hunting, not for extreme off-roading like the U8.
The capabilities of the three parties are actually well understood: the independent drive of the three motors achieves "stronger power performance than the dual motors", and the rear wheel dual motors are matched with an independent steering control architecture. The rear wheel gets a degree of freedom through the dual motors, which can provide additional steering angle. In the first half of the year, in the large-scale promotion of the X9’s rear wheel steering, everyone knows the benefits of this: first, in the scene of understeering and hitting the wall, it can give you extra ability to "turn around"; second, "oversteer". In the scene of hitting the wall, it can give you a pull in the opposite direction to prevent you from losing control.
However, compared to the passive steering of the rear wheels, the Z9GT’s rear wheel dual motors are an active existence, and the biggest difference is that "both rear wheels can make independent decisions". So the most extreme thing can be achieved "front wheel locking, only rely on the rear wheel steering, compass tail flick", and because the left and right sides are no longer "follow-up", differential torque adjustment can be achieved. In this "folio section" where one side is dry road and the other side is rain and snow slippery road, it can maintain the balance of walking on a tightrope.
Therefore, both the steering radius and the driving safety can exhibit a very strong form – for example, the elk test of 93.6 km/h, which is the current global record.
If you say open road, very small turning radius, although it is also rare, but not unique, then 140km/h flat tire can still walk a tightrope down this matter, I think this is it is different from other products, the strongest feature: safety is the greatest luxury.
In a 30W + car, there is currently no one that can do better at this angle.
If you find that "it really is, this is what makes it unique", then you are right: this is the connotation of luxury, and Chinese luxury cars are looking to gain momentum.
